Another Crap Blog

Lying, Deceitful Right-Wing Bastards

And another thing.  Enough with this bullshit description of Foley's messages as "over-friendly".  Ann Coulter, on that other schmuck Bill O'Reilly's show on Tuesday, downplayed the severity of the messages, several times saying that Foley asking a boy what he wanted for his birthday was no big deal.  Well, for anyone who hasn't had the opportunity to view the text of some of the more vile exchanges, please go to this link.  Masturbation, hand-jobs, lotion, ejaculation...it has it all.  And people like Coulter and other Republican assholes really need to shut the fuck up, because this goes way beyond "over-friendly", and for that uber-bitch Coulter to downplay it and decribe it as something innocent should be grounds for enforced muzzling.

Foley Saga - Silence of the Religious Right Hypocrite Bastards

I was replying to comments on my last post, but then decided this topic needed it's own post.  The commenters were discussing the Foley saga in terms of whether it is a political or moral issue.  Well, the morality issue brings one major aspect to the forefront for me.  Where the Hell is the Religious Right now?  They're pretty damn quiet, aren't they?  If this had been a Democrat the religious outrage would have been like an exploding supernova.  Where's Falwell now?  Or Robertson?  Or any of these gargantuan hypocrites.  That shithead Falwell is the one who brought up that one of the Teletubbies is gay because he carries a handbag and is the color of gay pride...that he is a danger to the children.  How about a sick fuck who emails teenagers and asks them to come over for a massage, what does that do for the children?  But do we hear anything from the asshole on this?  That, to me, is one of the biggest crimes which has emerged out of all of this, and is not getting its fair attention.  It is seemingly ok to use religion to sway politics if it helps the Right, but these same shitbirds say nothing if religion and morality could somehow hurt the Right on election day.  What the fuck is up with that?  Political hypocrisy is one thing, but if I'm wrong and there is indeed a God, I hope the silence of the Right dooms them to an eternity of shovelling shit in very hot temperatures.  Indeed, it is of quite some comfort to me to know that if I am indeed wrong about the existence of any form of deity, that I will be able to kick in the nuts these assholes who thought they were headed up to the good place but then found out that there was no place there for hypocritical scumbags.

Foley - Wretched Pervert, But Moronic Imbecile Too

So we all know by now that Congessman Foley is a sick fuck.  What doesn't seem to be mentioned is that he is also a complete moron.  How stupid do you have to be to write your twisted pederast emails to teenagers that actually work with you?  In Congress!  At least your run-of-the-mill sicko paedophile has the sense to write anonymously in chat rooms.  But this idiot writes to boys openly, in his own workplace.  If I didn't know better I'd say he was a sleeper agent, trained since birth by the Democrats to infiltrate the Republicans and find a way to set off as big a shit-storm as possible from within.  And as for the Republicans, Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert not only should resign but should also be bitch slapped by his fellow Republicans.  He knew about Foley and did nothing, for which he should be removed for neglecting a child in need.  But he has also opened the door for all the flak the Republicans are now taking.  Of being told about Foley's messages, Hastert's office put out a statement saying the "Speaker does not explicitly recall this conversation", though he does not deny it took place.  Well that's complete bullshit.  Who the hell gets told that a fellow congressman is sending obscene messages to children and not only does nothing about it, but forgets even being told?  If you ask me he's a lying cocksucker and as culpable as Foley.  As are all Republicans who knew about it and did not immediately have Foley removed.  And they are all pretty much as stupid as Foley was, for not protecting themselves from exactly the situation they find themselves in today by dealing with Foley as soon as they knew about him.  Please tell me the difference between the Foley situation and this invented scenario - you find out one of your children's teachers is writing inappropriate emails to students.  You do nothing about it.  OK, we know in this scenario the teacher is a villain, but isn't the parent who does nothing about it equally villainous?  Isn't allowing someone to remain in a position of power with many young students - in Foley's case, pages - under their wing, downright evil?  Especially since the only reason to do so here was to avoid a little political embarrassment.  Hmm, a little political embarrassment versus a child violated by a grown man using his position of power to ensnare said chid.  Tough call.  What a bunch of cocksuckers.  It's actually the only good thing, and what a good thing, to come out of all this - the increased potential for the Democrats to take back the House and Senate.  Granted the Senate is still a stretch, but this link shows it may not be as great a stretch as once it was.  Finally it looks like we can put an end to the tragic situation of having both the House and Senate controlled by the same party as the most unqualified buffoon ever to have sat in the White House.

Vengeance for Steve Irwin

People are stupid.  I mean, a lot of people are stupid.  And then some people are really, really stupid, as is evidenced by this article.  Apparently at least 10 stingrays have been found dead and mutilated in Australia.  That's right, to avenge Steve Irwin's death people are going vigilante against stingrays.  If you're not with us, you're against us, damnit!  It's a good thing the Crocodile Hunter wasn't killed by a dog, or poodles everywhere would be in microwaves right now.

In other news, Saddam Hussein in an angry outburst, during the testimony of a Kurdish witness, shouted  "We will crush your heads".  How delighted his lawyers must have been by his witty repartee.

Path to 9/11 and other shit

Two things bug me.  ABC's propaganda film Path to 9/11 coming to your TV soon and poo on my bathroom wall next to the toilet.  Both of them are shit, the only difference is ABC's broadcast is offensive shit, where the other is just evidence of my son not having quite perfected doing his own wiping yet.  In case the film is new to anyone, it is a film purporting to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and it details how the Clinton administration was to blame for 9/11.  It was written by an avowed Conservative and has several completely fictional scenes made out to be facts taken from the 9/11 Commission Report. ABC are airing it over 2 nights, for 6 hours without commercial interruption.  Coincidentally enough, this is also shortly before the mid-term elections where the Republicans look likely to receive a good ass-whooping.  Not a bad distraction from the thunderous mistakes of the present administration and a smearing of the last Democrat one.  With any luck it will be pulled before broadcast.  This link leads to the latest development.  It is a letter from Madeleine Albright and Sandy Berger detailing  scenes which have been pulled directly from the same area from which my son's poo came.  And they should know, as the film details as "fact" certain fictions which these two are supposed to have carried out.  Make sure to click on the link leading to the actual letter - it makes for interesting reading.  To get the whole story from the beginning you can surf back through the stories on that same site.

As for the literal poo, I'm not too sure how that happens.  I can see that the wiping doesn't go exactly according to plan and leaves him with certain deposits on his fingers, but I don't know why they always get smeared on the wall above the toilet paper rather than the paper itself.  Or his clothes.  Or his hair.  Or his brother.  Perhaps I'll have to invest in a "Poo Cam".

Antichrists - Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter – what an ass monkey. The plan is for this to be an occasional series of articles, each one on a different “antichrist”, which for my purposes will be defined as someone who really, really pisses me off. This could be because they are evil or malicious or mean-spirited or just really stupid. Stupid really bugs me, so that’s why the likes of Britney will find themselves on the end of my diatribe soon.

Now where was I? Oh yes, Ann Coulter, what an ass monkey. There isn’t a lot of original thinking I can add on this topic as the fact that she is a total imbecile has been well documented, and so much idiotic swill has oozed out of her snout that going through it all would be redundant. So I’m just going to remind us all of some of her highlights, point out why she’s actually good for the left (more on that later), and I’ll also insult the horse-faced buffoon a little, just because it makes me feel better. I’ll also link liberally (no pun intended) so folks can get to much of her verbal excrement from one place.

Some of her most precious pearls:

• Her solution to the problems in the Middle East - “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."

• On the Oklahoma bomber - "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building."  To which she added later, "after everyone had left the building except the editors and reporters." 

• From her book Slander: "Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now."

• This gem spoken at a conservative conference: "I think our motto should be, post-9/11, 'Raghead talks tough, raghead faces consequences."

• In The Independent, this beauty which goes quite well with the previous entry: “They're never very high in anyone's caste system, are they? Poor little Pakis."

• On Geraldo’s show: "[Clinton] masturbates in the sinks."

• From her column (10/29/99): "[The] backbone of the Democratic Party [is a] "typical fat, implacable welfare recipient."

• Of the four 9/11 widows: “I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much." And then queried, “how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies?"

• Speaking at a university: "You don't want the Republicans in power, does that mean you want a dictatorship, gay boy?"

• On the Danish cartoon controversy: “The 'offense to Islam' ruse is merely an excuse for Muslims to revert to their default mode: rioting and setting things on fire."

• On TV show Hannity & Colmes: “Are all the American people that don't support him [President George W. Bush] dumb? COULTER: No. I think, as I indicated in my last book, they're traitors.

• On Canada: "[Canadians] better hope the United States doesn't roll over one night and crush them.  They are lucky we allow them to exist on the same continent."

 Granted, that last one is quite funny. There, now Canadians hate me too.

A nice selection of the filth she spews. Does she mean it? Does it matter even if she doesn’t, the damage is done? Has she now become nothing more than a figure of ridicule? If one must use up any thought time on the harridan, I suppose these are the answers as I see them. She doesn’t mean all of it. Probably. Her “career”, her existence in the public consciousness which is her very lifeblood, now depends upon the controversies that spring forth when she opens her trap. And when, as of late, she has a book to promote, watch out! If one can set aside one’s animosity towards her for a second it might be possible to admire her marketing and promotional savvy. She certainly knows how to move “books”. Would it be more acceptable if it were calculated incitement of controversy to induce book sales than if it is just the crazed ravings of a certifiable lunatic? That will depend on each individual and what they consider acceptable in the pursuit of making as many bucks as possible while one is marketable. Freedom of speech and all that. But is it Hate speech? And if it is the case that she infects the ether with her obnoxious rantings only for self-promotion, does there come a point when she will have tipped over the peak of Mount Gone-Too-Far and both her and her career will careen downhill into oblivion faster than you can say “aardvark look-alike bitch”?

This could well become the case if people would make more of her recent plagiarism controversy. Turns out she’s a thief. And a cheat. And a liar. See here, here and here for sites dealing with that. In short, the pea-brain has been found out, and great swaths of her writing appear to be pilfered with no credit given whatsoever. Ordinarily this spells the end for a writer, but it looks as though she may slime her way through this.

But then there’s this option – she’s good for the left, she’s the worst thing that’s happened to the right and she should stay exactly where she is and keep up her buffoonery. Could this be the case? Here’s the theory, though I’m not necessarily sold on it yet. The theory goes that her crazed ravings bring everyone’s focus to what is worst and most divisive and ugly and damaging about politics and partisan politics and punditry. She is so extreme that the only people who take her remotely seriously already hold her beliefs anyway and are just as certifiable as her. Nothing she says could ever convert anyone’s beliefs or win over any supporters from the other side. Ever. The only thing she can and does accomplish is to drive away fence-sitters. Those in the middle, swaying, not knowing where to go, hear her vomitus emitting from her gaping hole and get driven away very quickly. The more she becomes any kind of face of the right, the more she turns the right into a joke. If I lived on the right I would want her living alone on an island with only a volleyball or coconut to talk to as soon as practicable. The poor volleyball would be begging the coconut to stomp on it's head to save it from her droning, nasal, vacuous bullshit.

 
I don’t know if that theory holds water, but it seems sound to me. So maybe the left should be embracing her (and rapidly bathing afterwards). But that’s only the case if one wants to win at all costs. If one believes that she and all those like her – Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Hannity, etc. – are simply divisive idiots who cause greater chasms between us all and make the airwaves and the country in general a less pleasant place to be, then one should start the process for an enforced muzzling law. Particularly when she gets downright mean-spirited, as with suggesting that the four 9/11 widows were grateful for their husbands deaths.

 
All that said, I wrote this to get things off my chest and for what little comedy my limited talents can muster (and here's a rather funny Ann related video that's well worth watching). But there’s still that freedom of speech thing and another unique invention known as a remote control. I suppose we could always just throw the remote at the TV and leave the room. Or just tune in to Air America.  But what I wouldn’t give for all the aforementioned people to be locked in a small room for a year with Paris Hilton, Jessica Simpson, Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan. The pundits would probably have gnawed each other’s throats out within a week. Unless they bring their cellphones, in which the girls had better not answer O’Reilly’s phone calls.

                                               ******************************

Anyone interested in seeing me carry on this new series of Antichrists, feel free to let me know.  Potential future victims include Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Katherine Harris, Paris/Britney/Jessica/Lindsay, and many more.

 

Hannity, Insane Hatemonger?

I'm getting to my aforementioned Antichrists piece, but something I just read really pisses me off.  Sean Hannity, for those who don't know he is a right-wing Fox "News" TV pundit, and he may well get his own Antichrist column from me, said on his radio show yesterday:

"there are things in life worth fighting and dying for, and one of 'em is making sure (House Democratic Leader) Nancy Pelosi doesn't become the speaker."

Hannity was seeking to make sure that Republican voters come out and prevent an embarrassing turnaround in the upcoming mid-term elections.  My problem is this: does this not almost sound like a call to suicide bombing?  Obviously that's extreme and not what he meant, but is it acceptable to say that it is worth fighting and dying to keep the Democrats from winning an election?  "Fighting and dying"? I know not many people have come across this blog yet, but any who do I'd appreciate a comment if you agree, to reassure me that I am not going insane in thinking this is not acceptable.  Or if you disagree, so I can know for sure that I have gone insane.

Idea for Antichrist Series

I have an idea for a series of posts.  It shall be titled The Antichrists and each one will deal with a different person who I feel to be a plague on the earth.  My first victim is going to be Ann Coulter.  Too easy I hear you say.  That's as maybe, and I may have nothing original to say on the matter, but she just bugs the shit out of me so I'm going to have my say anyway.  Expect future pieces on some or all of Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Katherine Harris, Paris/Britney/Jessica/Lindsay, and many more.  Perhaps if anyone likes the series I'll even take requests.  If all goes well expect the first one up later today.