There is a potentially controversial article in today's Sunday Times (UK) about obesity. The article postulates that fatness and obesity are directly related to poverty and ignorance. That rich, educated people are rarely fat. Also in the article is this:
Obese means not just podgy, but dangerously, disablingly, distastefully fat, as in American fat.
I have to admit to having a chuckle when I read that. And for full disclosure I am an expat Brit living in the US. And I love the US so it is not a sleight on this country, but no one can deny the preponderance of vast, humongous people shaking the sidewalk as they walk along. Those who actually do walk anywhere, that is. And, as the article itself shows, Britain is not immune from this problem. In fact, they are probably second only to the US. But the US certainly must have a problem for Americans to be used as examples whenever the conversation turns to obesity. Not just in this article, but whenever I travel outside this country I find the topic comes up an inordinate number of times. "Oh, you live in America, isn't everyone beastly and fat over there?" To which, after today's article, I can now respond "No, only the poor, stupid ones apparently."
I have two main points I want to consider. First, is the article's theory true? Second, are the parents of obese kids stupid or evil? As for the first point, I am leaning towards it being half true. Or maybe three quarters. Half true because I buy the notion that the poor find it harder to eat healthily on a purely financial basis. Three quarters because I don't think that ignorance or lack of education plays that large a role. But it does play some role, so I'm accounting for a bit of stupidity in there with the poverty.
We shop at Whole Foods (a healthy, largely organic food supermarket) and Publix (a major supermarket chain). And it is patently obvious upon simply perusing the receipts that when we do a weekly shop at Whole Foods we are paying around $100 more than when we do it at Publix. Healthy, natural foods are more expensive than processed crap. I recently heard an old lady in the checkout line explaining, as though ashamed since no one had asked her, that she was buying a loaf of 20 cent supermarket-brand white bread because it was all she could afford. There is no doubt that it is cheaper to eat like shit. It is also easier, especially if you go for the fast food option ahead of cooking your own cheap, unhealthy crap. It occurs to me that there is also a laziness factor involved here which no doubt goes hand in hand with the "no exercise" cause of obesity. Better to drag yourself into the car and drive two blocks for a super-sized quadruple cheeseburger than to walk to the kitchen and have to stand there making, or zapping, something. But yes, coming back from my tangent, lower incomes certainly play a part. But lower education?
On that one I'm torn. On one side of the question, I have a few friends myself who, though not obese, could stand to shed a few dozen pounds. And most of these are highly intellectual, college-educated people in very successful careers. I wouldn't go so far as to say that they are smarter than me, but they would. They are well-off and clever, so where do they come into the equation? And on the inverse side of the same query, if stupidity played any part in fatness, Britney Spears, Jessica Simpson, Paris Hilton and Lindsey Lohan would be like a pod of blue whales. So I'm not sure I can agree on that. The one quarter fraction that I gave to the ignorance side of the theory comes for those people out there, and I suppose there must be some, who are so ignorant that still now they don't realize that eating crap and living on the sofa results in a couple of extra pounds gained. But other than that I don't believe that any lack of education allows you to never stumble across the information that eating fast food and other crap might be somewhat detrimental to your figure.
Now for part two. Are the parents of obese kids stupid or evil? I believe that these are your only choices. And I'm not talking about anyone who is obese through some kidney condition or any other ill-health or accident. Or even those cases that do exist where the obesity is hereditary. I am talking about obese kids, seemingly nearly always the product of obese parents, made that way by their bad diet. Parents have full and total control over what their small children ingest, from infancy through to at least early teens. Maybe before that they get the chance to sneak the odd candy bar here or there at a friend's house, but obesity comes from a long campaign of overfeeding crap to your children. So, does this happen out of moronic ignorance or plain Beelzebub-worshiping evil? For surely the obese parents are all too well aware of whatever unpleasantness life throws at an obese person. From whatever personal feelings of discomfort, to actual fatness-induced illnesses or diseases, to the mockery of cruel children, to the difficulties of getting around in one's day-to-day life. There may be exceptions, but I would be enormously surprised to hear any obese person turn down an offer from a well-meaning genie to turn them into a healthy, fit, thin person. That just wouldn't happen. And that being the case, any loving obese parent, who by definition as a parent would want the very best life possible for their child, is not going to want their child to grow up obese themselves, with a catalog of obesity-related diseases. According to the Times article, two thirds of diabetes cases in Britain are of the avoidable type 2 associated with obesity. Also, obesity increases your risk of having major illnesses, such as stroke, heart disease, some types of cancer and osteoarthritis. Clearly no parent wants that for their child. So, all that said, I now state that any parent who knows the effects of a bad diet and yet still stuffs their children so much and so often that they become obese at such a young age is either irretrievably stupid - they really don't know the effect that their diet will have - or unconscionably evil - they know but still willingly opt to give their children a shorter and more unpleasant life than they otherwise could and should have had.
It is common knowledge, here in the US, that fat people are stupidly evil. If they weren't so dumb they would be ruling the world with a big, fat iron fist. Under this rule, the "skinnies" would be forced to eat a mixure of Crisco, mayonaise and butter until they too had heart problems. It would be an ugly world, my friend. Just be glad those fat bastrards are so dim.
Posted by: Clay | August 27, 2006 at 03:47 PM
Thank you, Clay, for adding a healthy dollop of extra controversy to that which my post might already have provoked. Now we have oodles of it.
Posted by: Al | August 27, 2006 at 04:09 PM
There is one skinny, as we're reminded every year since his inauguration, who is stupidly evil.
Posted by: Bruce Alexander | August 28, 2006 at 05:05 PM
Are the parents of obese kids stupid or evil?
why did you immediately jettison the idea that they might be poor?
you linked to this from a news article on killoggs which mentioned that mississippi is the "fattest" state in america. well what a coincidence that it is also, by far, the poorest.
i doubt that there is a whole foods in the entire state.
it is very difficult for overweight parents to loose weight, much less put their kids on a diet when they are running themselves ragged in order to make ends meet at the end of the month.
i denote more than a hint of classism in your thinking.
in fact, "poor" is a pretty classist term. i think working class is the term you are looking for.
Posted by: kiche | August 30, 2006 at 11:33 AM
No, I don't think it is. And poor is not "classist", it is a simple expression of how much money someone has.
Mainly though, my piece was not intended as a fully-fleshed out discussion of the problem, which would require a book to do. It was a superficial look at a newspaper article postulating that education and income played a role in the obesity problem. It was the article that postulated the poor and uneducated angles. I was just considering the article's premise. The only part of the article that constituted my own thoughts, and I stand by them, was at the end when I suggest that obese parents have it in their power to make sure that their children do not succumb to the same "addiction" as they have. And when I see obese parents walking around with their obese children I feel that the parents have severely let down their children. Two parents addicted to smack or crack do not start their kids on their own addiction. Because, amongst other reasons, they do not want their children to suffer as they have. No one is in a better position to prevent children getting obese than obese parents who know all the problems pursuant to such a condition. Even if they can't stop eating themselves, they are perfectly capable of making sure that their small children eat smaller portions. It has nothing to do with how busy the parents are. And nothing to do with putting their kids on a diet. Knowing that they don't want their children to suffer like themselves they should never have allowed them to become obese in the first place. I guarantee that if you saw how much is on the plate of their obese children it would not be the reasonable portion that a child needs. All too often I see children 5 and 6 years old already on course to be like their parents. I don't believe there is any argument out there that is going to make me feel for the parents, however addicted to food, who do not have it in them to make their children's lives better than their own, when all it takes is to dish out a smaller portion for them.
Posted by: Al | August 30, 2006 at 11:46 AM
Fat people should be conscripted sent to Iraq and Afghanistan.
That way, we'd solve the obesity problem and troop shortages at the same time.
Posted by: CaptainReality | October 17, 2007 at 10:20 PM
Plenty of rich, educated types are fat. Shoot, being rich they tend to be fatter. They can afford lots of yummier, more expensive treats a lot more often. No time to cook healthy food either, so that's even more fat.
Posted by: lose weight quick | November 24, 2009 at 04:57 PM
Some time before, I did need to buy a building for my firm but I did not earn enough money and could not buy anything. Thank heaven my mother suggested to get the loans from trustworthy bank. Therefore, I acted so and was happy with my short term loan.
Posted by: StokesBridgett22 | June 23, 2010 at 10:26 PM
You should not look at just the cost of food in a superstore when you say lower income people are more obese than higher income, better educated people. Look at how lower income people spend their money. They will struggle to buy top end consumer goods. The money will come from saving a few bucks by eating junk food.
Posted by: Peter Stockwell | August 22, 2010 at 05:17 AM
I just linked this article on my facebook account. It’s an interesting read for everyone.
Posted by: Eli | September 13, 2010 at 11:34 AM
A myriad of fires light the night
From our camp on the river bank.
The shrieking snowstorm breaks my dream
Of my peaceful, tranquil home.
Posted by: christian louboutin | November 03, 2010 at 02:20 AM
Wow,wish the killing would just stop.... for both sides ...
Posted by: coach outlet | November 04, 2010 at 08:55 PM
We all need fresh air.
Posted by: christian louboutin shoes | November 13, 2010 at 12:27 AM
We all need fresh air.
Posted by: chanel handbags | November 13, 2010 at 12:30 AM
We all need fresh air.
Posted by: louis vuitton handbags | November 13, 2010 at 12:30 AM
We all need fresh air.
Posted by: gucci handbags | November 13, 2010 at 12:32 AM
i agree with your views from here.
Posted by: Nike Air Max | April 20, 2011 at 11:56 PM
They can afford lots of yummier, more expensive treats a lot more often.
Posted by: ClubPenguin | May 24, 2011 at 08:12 PM